Should you always commission a full structural survey before buying?

Question

Rich Dad · Accepted Answer

“If you’re about to spend six figures without checking the bones, you’re not investing — you’re gambling.”
Let’s be clear: a property isn’t granite countertops and fresh paint — it’s foundations, structure, roof, drainage, and load-bearing integrity. The pretty stuff is lipstick. The structure is the skeleton. If you’re buying a £300,000 property and skip a £700–£1,500 full structural survey to “save money,” that’s like refusing a medical scan before surgery because it costs extra. That’s amateur hour.
Now, do you always need one? No. But serious investors think in probabilities and downside risk. If the house is older than 30 years, has been extended, shows cracking, is in a mining area, or looks like it’s been “DIY renovated,” you’d be reckless not to commission a full building survey. Subsidence repairs alone can run £15,000–£50,000. Roof replacement? £8,000–£20,000. Structural wall issues? Easily £10,000+. That £1,000 survey suddenly looks like a rounding error.
But here’s where I think differently than the cautious crowd: I don’t buy surveys just for safety — I buy them for leverage. A good structural report is a negotiation weapon. If the survey uncovers £12,000 worth of needed repairs, that’s ammunition. You can renegotiate the price or demand repairs before completion. I’ve seen investors shave 3–7% off purchase prices purely because they had documentation. On a £400,000 property, that’s £12,000–£28,000 saved. That’s not expense — that’s strategy.
Now let’s address the counterpoint: if you’re buying a nearly new property (under 10 years old) with an active NHBC warranty and no red flags, a full structural survey may be overkill. In that case, a HomeBuyer Report might be sufficient. You don’t need a CT scan for a paper cut. But if this is your first purchase and you don’t know what you’re looking at? You don’t have experience — so you buy expertise.
Think like a business owner. Property is a leveraged asset. Most people borrow 75–90% of the purchase price. If you’re taking on a £270,000 mortgage, you’re leveraging yourself 4–5x your deposit. When leverage increases, risk management becomes non-negotiable. Professional investors perform due diligence because one structural surprise can wipe out years of appreciation.
The only time I’d skip a full structural survey is if I already planned a full renovation and budgeted contingencies of 15–20%. If I’m gutting the place anyway, I’m pricing in structural uncertainty. But for a normal residential buyer hoping for “move-in ready”? Get the full survey and use it strategically.
Wealth isn’t built by avoiding fees — it’s built by avoiding catastrophic mistakes.
“Spend thousands to save tens of thousands — that’s how grown-ups invest.”

Poor Dad · Answer

“If you’re about to sign a 25-year mortgage, the least you can do is check what you’re tying yourself to.”
Buying a home is likely the largest financial commitment you’ll ever make. For many people, it represents 5–10 times their annual salary and decades of repayments. In that context, a full structural survey costing £800–£1,500 is not an extravagance — it is prudence. You must think about security, long-term stability, and protecting your savings.
A basic mortgage valuation is not a survey. It protects the lender, not you. A HomeBuyer Report offers a surface-level inspection, but it may not uncover deeper issues like structural movement, damp penetration behind walls, roof integrity problems, or outdated load-bearing alterations. I have seen families discover after moving in that their “minor crack” was subsidence, leading to £20,000 repair bills and months of stress. Stress has a cost too — financially and emotionally.
However, I will say this carefully: not every property requires a full structural survey. If the home is relatively new (under 10 years old), comes with a valid structural warranty, and shows no visible concerns, a mid-level survey may be sufficient. You should match the survey type to the property’s age and condition. Over-inspecting a brand-new flat might be unnecessary spending — and every pound counts when furnishing and building an emergency fund.
Be especially cautious with older homes (pre-1970s), properties with extensions, listed buildings, or homes in areas prone to flooding or subsidence. These situations increase uncertainty. In uncertain situations, you reduce risk — you do not assume the best. Remember that once you complete the purchase, the responsibility is entirely yours. There is no undo button.
Also consider your personal financial cushion. If unexpected repairs of £10,000 would severely impact your savings or push you into debt, then you cannot afford surprises. In that case, the safest route is the most detailed survey available. Peace of mind has value. Predictability has value.
Some buyers argue that surveys sometimes miss things anyway. That may be true — no inspection is perfect. But professional documentation gives you some recourse and negotiation power. Going in blind gives you none.
When committing to decades of repayments, caution is not weakness — it is wisdom.
“If you can’t afford the survey, you can’t afford the house.”

Should you always commission a full structural survey before buying?

Rich Dad Says

Poor Dad Says

The Bottom Line

Whose advice would you follow?

Share this debate

What do you think? (0)

More debates