Should you spend significantly on your children's extra-curricular activities?

Question

Rich Dad · Accepted Answer

“If you’re going to spend money on your kid, don’t buy toys — buy leverage.”
Let’s get something straight: extracurricular activities are not expenses — they’re investments in human capital. But only if you treat them that way. Throwing $5,000 a year at random piano lessons, travel soccer, coding camp, ballet, and robotics just because other parents are doing it? That’s emotional spending. Strategic spending is different.
Here’s the reality: the world doesn’t reward straight-A students nearly as much as it rewards confidence, communication, leadership, and grit. Debate club teaches persuasion. Competitive sports teach resilience under pressure. Theater builds stage presence. Coding clubs create technical leverage. A kid who can pitch an idea at 16 has a massive advantage over one who just memorizes textbooks.
Let’s talk numbers. If you spend $8,000 per year for 10 years on high-quality development — that’s $80,000. Sounds big, right? Now compare that to a child who develops elite skills, earns a scholarship worth $40,000 per year for 4 years ($160,000), or builds a business in college generating $50,000 per year because they have the confidence and network. Suddenly that “expense” becomes a 5x or 10x return.
Look at examples. Serena and Venus Williams’ father invested relentlessly in coaching. Tiger Woods’ dad did the same. Even outside sports — kids in competitive robotics programs often land internships at 18. Debate champions get into Ivy League schools. Is there risk? Absolutely. Not every violin lesson leads to Carnegie Hall. That’s why you invest where talent and interest intersect, not where social pressure pushes you.
Now the counterargument: burnout. Overscheduling. Entitlement. Yes — if you’re stuffing their calendar 6 days a week and financing $3,000 travel tournaments they secretly hate, you’re buying stress, not growth. The key is intensity + alignment. One or two serious pursuits > five shallow ones.
And here’s the uncomfortable truth: in a competitive world, average preparation leads to average outcomes. Public school plus “free time” used on TikTok is not a strategy. If you want your kid to compete globally, you don’t prepare locally.
Would I mortgage the house for youth hockey? No. Would I allocate 10–20% of household discretionary income toward serious skill-building? In a heartbeat.
Because the real asset you’re building isn’t a trophy — it’s capability.
Don’t spend to impress other parents. Spend to compound your child’s potential.

Poor Dad · Answer

“Be careful — not every childhood hobby needs to come with a five-figure price tag.”
I understand wanting the best for your children. Every parent does. But “significantly” spending on extracurricular activities can quickly become financial strain disguised as love. If you are putting activities on credit cards, reducing retirement contributions, or sacrificing your emergency fund, that is not wise — it’s risky.
Let’s look at practical numbers. If a family spends $6,000 per year on travel sports from age 8 to 18, that’s $60,000 — not including equipment, travel, and lost work time. Invested in a simple index fund earning 7% annually, that same money could grow to over $85,000 by the time your child turns 18. That could fund college tuition, reduce student loans, or provide a down payment for their first home. Security matters.
Statistically, fewer than 7% of high school athletes play in college, and less than 2% receive athletic scholarships. The odds of “going pro” are even smaller. I’m not saying don’t support their interests — I’m saying don’t gamble your financial stability on low-probability outcomes.
There are many affordable options that still provide benefits: community sports leagues instead of elite travel teams, school music programs instead of private conservatories, local coding clubs instead of $4,000 tech camps. Children gain teamwork, discipline, and social skills without the premium price tag.
Another concern is burnout and pressure. Overscheduled children often experience stress and anxiety. Free play, family dinners, and downtime are also essential for healthy development. Sometimes the best investment is simply your time — helping with homework, reading together, teaching financial responsibility, or modeling a strong work ethic.
And think long term. Your child benefits more from parents who are financially stable, have retirement savings, and avoid debt than from parents who overspent on competitive gymnastics. Financial stress in the household can affect children more than missing an elite program ever will.
Support their interests, yes — but live within your means. Provide opportunity, not extravagance.
A secure home and funded future will outlast any trophy.

Should you spend significantly on your children's extra-curricular activities?

Rich Dad Says

Poor Dad Says

The Bottom Line

Whose advice would you follow?

Share this debate

What do you think? (0)

More debates